Student
Review
University of Oxford,
graduate of The King Edward VI School
|
Ratings
1. Quality of Teachers - * * * *
*
2. Class selections - * * * * *
3. Extracurricular Activities - * * * * *
4. College Counseling and Preparation - * * * *
5. Quality of Student Life - * * * *
|
Academics
The King Edward VI School (Southampton) is academically outstanding in all areas but is particularly well equiped in the sciences, sports and music. The school also devotes a significant amount of time to mathematics and modern languages, a minimum of 5 hour a week of class time for the former and 4 hours a week for the latter. The school also recruits only specialist teachers (i.e. those with a related degree to at least degree level) to teach at GCSE level and above. The school does very well in focusing on each student's strengths and ensuring that his/her particular potential in a given area is fully realised. With 1 hour - 1.5 hours a day homework at pre-GCSE level and up to 3 hours a day at A level, the school manages to encourage a high level of work from its students while still doing very well to take students' welfare and their life outside of academia into account. The extent to which work and deadline are enforced does, however vary greatly between teachers. The strong work ethic prepares students well for university and future life. Classes are small and invariably well organised, ensuring that large amounts can be covered very quickly and in great detail. This and comprehensive planning and monitoring ensure that syllabuses are covered comprehensively and early, leaving plenty of time for revision at the end of term prior to external examinations. Yearly examinations and streaming ensure that pupils learn with others of a similar ability after the second year in all disciplines in which numbers make more than one class feasible. Teachers are invariably entertaining and inspiring and encourage an enthusiasm in the subject by showing a willingness to answer questions and fill in background information that goes beyond the syllabus, while also being careful not to be distracted from the task of ensuring students are prepared for external examinations. With a significant number of examiners employed as staff, the school also does well at ensuring that pupils know exactly what they will be facing come their final examinations. Perhaps the only criticisms of the school I could offer is that it has a tangible competitive and boisterous atmosphere, and those who do not keep up occasionally end up giving up as a result of this. Pupils are expected to keep up, even if this means working twice as hard as the rest of the class to do so, which for some can be too much. Also, particularly at A level, independent learning is not depended on as much as other sixth-form colleges, which means that some may struggle following leaving a class environment and entering university. Invariably, however, this is as a result of the fact that class sizes are so small and teaching so well-organised and comprehensive that students are rarely required to learn things for themselves. While work outside of class is heavy, it is often for the purpose of assessment and development of writing style than for learning outside of the classroom.
College
Counseling
University admissions were emphasised throughout sixth-form and addressed well over a year before applications needed to be made. A very efficiently run careers department was always open for drop-in sessions and advice and students were made aware of this resource. With between 10 and 20% of students going to Oxbridge each year, the school deals very well with those heading for a place at the top two universities and has good connections and relations with several colleges. The school also organised open day trips to a significant range of universities. The careers department were incredibly helpful with the application, with detailed feedback on several submissions of my personal statement (to the point where the final thing hardly resembled the initial draft) and compulsory sessions to go through UCAS application. Two sessions of interview preparation, both with externally brought in professionals, one free and one heavily subsidised, were also invaluable in informing one what the process would be like, providing exceptionally good positive feedback and reducing nerves for real interviews. Interview and entrance examination prep was also conducted with me by the head of economics(the subject i was applying to read) in his own time, after school, during which we went through past entrance examinations and held discussions that proved exceptionally useful. He also went through my personal statement, providing constructive criticism and indicators of potential questions in an interview. Overall I felt the school took an incredibly deep and genuine interest in my application, though I would speculate that it would not have been so had i not been applying to Oxford or Cambridge. This is somewhat symptomatic of the schools efforts to make sure that the top fraction excel, occasionally to the negligence of the rest of the school. Perhaps the most significant criticism of the counselling service is that it was invariably the case that students were all too often encouraged to apply to colleges and universities that were 'below them', and discouraged from making ambitious applications, particularly to Oxford and Cambridge, for which students failing to attain 7 A*s at GCSE level were refused any help with their application. I would speculate (perhaps cynically) that this was to make success rate statistics look better. My (successful) application to Merton, the most academic and one of the most selective colleges in Oxford was more despite, rather than because of advice I had received, with both my careers advisor and headmaster telling me I would not get in if I applied there. Having been at Merton for a year, I know that this was definitely not the case, and that I was not just lucky. This appears to be the general case for prospective applicants to top colleges in Oxford and Cambridge, though it must be noted that once I insisted applying to the college in question (after an open-day visit), the school got behind me entirely, offering far more support and help than I would ever expect.
Admission Process
The school mainly takes at 11+, though they also have been known to take at 13+. I am not sure about the admissions criteria of the latter of these entry points, though I have no reason to believe that it is any easier or harder to enter at 13+, subject to capacity; the school is more interested in maintaining standards than having a large number of fee paying students. Entrance at for A-level is significantly easier, with no entrance exam and relatively low GCSE requirements, though as a result, many students who join at 16+ have been known to struggle and not to enjoy their A-level course. At the time when I took the test, the school tested English, Maths and Reasoning, each taking 1 hour and all one after the other with a ten minute break, so it can be quite exhausting and timed prep is a must. Much of what one can expect can be found using 11+ CE sample papers. I covered these before taking the exam and found them a really useful guide for what to expect (in fact the actual exam was slightly easier). The time given to do each exam is more than adequate, so pupils should be coached to check their work after completion. Maths focused entirely on short-answer, sometimes multiple choice questions that would be standard for an intelligent child of 11 to know, without anything really complicated. These included fractions (e.g. which is the largest and which is the smallest: 1/2, 9/4, 0.47, shade 2/3 of this shape), long arithmetic, identification of different forms of symmetry, calculating averages and areas, converting verbal problems into simple arithmetic problems (John, Mark and Caroline get £45 between them for Christmas. John pays Caroline £7 which he owes her. How much does each have?) and very simple algebra (e.g. 4x=36; what is x). English had a set of comprehension questions in which the examined had to read a short story/chapter and answer questions on it, then a second half in which we were expected to write a longer piece on a single question. When I took the exam, the two options for this question were: 'What do you want to be when you grow up and why?' and 'What was the most memorable moment of your life?' The reasoning paper has a variety of verbal and non-verbal problems that. It is difficult to 'learn' how to do this paper well; most are naturally good or bad at it, though it is worth doing a few practices so that the student knows what to expect. I do not know what the exact requirements are for entry, but from what i gather, a very strong result in one test can make up for an abysmal result in another; it is not the case that each test has to be individually 'passed'. It is quite possible for a very bright child to get 100% in any of the exams. The school interviews all applicants, regardless of at what level they are entering. The main point of these seems to be to ensure that the child conforms to basic standards of politeness and attitude and is able to maintain a mature and appropriate conversation with an adult. It probably doesn't matter if he is an 11 year-old grandmaster at chess, plays rugby for England, or just enjoys playing football and computer games with his friends in his free time, though it is good to have an interest that the interviewee feels comfortable talking about in detail. The interview is basically a casual chat between the interviewer (a teacher at the school) and the pupil, rather than a probing and intellectual challenging grilling, usually about subjects such as 'what do you want to be when you grow up?', and 'what's your favourite subject'. I was also asked why I wanted to go to the school. It's probably best to ask this beforehand, just to check the answer, but it's also best if the response is genuine. They are likely to see through a rehearsed one, particularly on asking further questions. Generally, preparation is unlikely to help; I received none before mine and didn't feel any reason to feel disadvantaged or intimidated as a result. The interviewer does as much as possible to put the pupil at ease throughout, and candidates are asked to wear whatever they feel comfortable in. Of those who got in, an equal number of people were wearing a t-shirt and jeans to those that were wearing a shirt. I went after school in my uniform. At the end of the interview I was asked to read a short passage out loud from a book aimed at an 11 year-old audience (I think I read something by Roald Dahl. My brother was asked to read a passage from the first Harry Potter book), so it is a good idea to practice this if the candidate is not vary confident reading aloud. Overall, it\'s best to be honest. Giving an answer that might not be perceived as ideal is not as bad as you might think; my brother, who also applied successfully said that he didn't enjoy reading at all and that English was his least favourite subject, as he found it rather uninteresting and wasn't very good at it, to an interviewer who happened to be the head of English. The interviewer will often ask follow-up questions that will make it clear if a candidate has been dishonest (e.g. 'what have you read recently?' in response to someone who says they enjoy reading) and dishonesty will not go down well. I gather the school uses the interview as a negative tool: as long as nothing out of order is said or done, it probably won't affect the application, aside from perhaps offering a 'tie-break' for a borderline candidate. The school does not have any feeder school, with pupils coming from independent and state schools around the county, in roughly equal proportion, and I have no reason to believe that coming from an independent primary puts one in any better or worse a position. The school also have many scholarships of up to 25% for 11+ entry: sport, academic and music scholarships are all given to successful applicants each year and hardship bursaries of up to 100% are available children whose parents are on low incomes. Generally, parents are not expected to play an active role in the admissions process or communicate directly with the school, who are largely only interested on the child's attitude and academic ability, rather than how much their parents want them to go there, though the school are very helpful in dealing with queries about the admissions process.
Extracurricular
Activities
The school has an immense range of extra curricular activities. All staff are expected to maintain some commitment to an extra-curricular activity, which means that the school's clubs and societies are incredibly well resourced. The year I received my Duke of Edinburgh Silver Award, the school gave out more such awards than any other in Britain. The list of clubs and societies one can join is massive, including every mainstream sport, card-games, role-play games, chess, young enterprise, foreign language clubs, poetry, literature (the school boasts the only school 'Byron Society ["A society dedicated to the prose, verse and life of Lord Byron"] and altruistic groups (such as hospital visiting and Amnesty International). Students are given the responsibility and autonomy to set-up and organise groups themselves in the unlikely event that they do not find the group to fill their niche, meaning that no interest goes uncatered for. A particular emphasis on sport means that the school excels in this particular area becoming county champions of both rugby and girls' hockey during my time there. The school debating society was one I became particularly involved in, being president for my final year, and one of the best in the area. The school this year beat Winchester College to get to the final of the Oxford Schools' debating championships and holds internal debates every week, providing an excellent platform for debating and public speaking at University level and beyond. The school also regularly enters students in public speaking competitions, in which i thoroughly enjoyed competing. Fencing was another pastime that I took particular interest in, and I was lucky enough to be offered free fencing lessons twice a week by a fully qualified expert and included kit hire, participating in one or two external competitions a term. Generally, excellent staff backing and financial support ensure that there is something for everyone, whatever their interest.
Quality of Life
The provision of breakfast as extra is a fantastically useful service that the school provides, especially from students with a long commute from within the schools remarkably large catchment area (bus services are provided for as far a-field as New Milton. Unfortunately school lunches are somewhat poor in quality, though by no means lacking in choice and costing only £2 each. Bringing packed lunches is, however, quite common should the quality of school cuisine be a problem. The dining hall is large and sociable and altogether a pleasant atmosphere in which to eat and the building and school grounds are large and attractive, particularly for a city-school, with students given the freedom to roam as they please during break periods. While the neighbourhood is not overly rough, the school is located in an urban housing estate and there have been known to be violent incidents between students at the school and students at the nearby local comprehensive, though such incidents are rare and seldom serious. The school has an active parents' association, which runs frequent social events and an annual dinner. Annual events such as speech day and sports day are also held. The school, perhaps unusually for an institution of its age and standing, attracts a large number of students from low income backgrounds, largely as a result of the generous scholarship and bursary schemes that the school offers, which helps make the school a far more representative community than other similar independent educational establishments. The percentage of white pupils, however remains remarkably high, and i can think of only three black students within the entire student body during my time at the school. Overall, however, the school atmosphere is a fantastic one, and I can honestly say that I had a wonderful time there. The social environment, particularly among the older years is sociable and welcoming, if at times a little cliquey and hard to break into, particularly if entering at a 16+ level. The school has fantastic welfare provision, with a full time councillor and fully qualified nurse, and it is apparent that both staff and students go out of their way to ensure that the members of the school are happy and comfortable. All in all, I thoroughly enjoyed my time there and could think of no-where where I would have been happier.
|
|